Rhapsody Health Solutions Team

Peace of Mind with Meaningful Use Certification

Integration engines are at the core of transmitting data, both internally and externally. Many Meaningful Use requirements rely on the transmission of data. The CMS recently addressed the question of whether the integration engine must itself be a certified technology.

The above graphic really says it all. The information was taken from the CMS website, FAQ number 3211.

The question can be applied to an interface engine in this scenario:
  • A provider uses Meaningful Use-certified EHR technology to generate immunization information, but uses an uncertified integration engine to transmit the immunization information to the state.
  • Based on FAQ 3211 highlighted above, the providers would not be able to successfully demonstrate Meaningful Use.

As proof to the critical nature of the integration engine, Corepoint Health customer Hancock Regional Hospital (Greenfield, Ind.) was audited by the CMS for Meaningful Use compliance. One of the focus points of the audit was whether Corepoint Integration Engine was preventing them from successfully demonstrating Meaningful Use.

“We were audited by the CMS for our Meaningful Use Stage 1 attestation. One of the key areas of focus for the auditors was the certification status of the integration engine. Corepoint Health worked closely with us to ensure that we were able to successfully demonstrate Meaningful Use while using Corepoint Integration Engine.”

Areas where FAQ 3211 would apply to integration engines:

Public Health Reporting

Integration engines are commonly used to provide the transport of required public health information to the state. Because each state may have unique transport requirements for the reports, providers often find it more effective to leverage the flexibility of the integration engine to establish these communications.

Using an integration engine to transmit Public Health reporting impacts the following Meaningful Use criteria:

  • Transmission to Immunization Registries
  • Transmission to Public Health Agencies – Syndromic Surveillance
  • Transmission of Reportable Laboratory Tests and Values/Results
  • Transmission to Cancer Registries

Community Connectivity Public Health Reporting

Integration engines are also commonly used to establish communications with the provider community, once again leveraging the flexibility of the integration engine. The integration engine can be useful in managing the HISP requirements established for the Direct Project protocol introduced in Meaningful Use Stage 2, as well as providing alternatives for query-based communications. Meaningful Use criteria impacted by the use of an integration engine for connecting to the community include:

  • Transitions of Care – receive, display, and incorporate transition of care/referral summaries
  • Transitions of Care – create and transmit transition of care/referral summaries
  • Transmission of Electronic Laboratory Tests and Values/Results to Ambulatory Providers

The seven criteria listed above are criteria that a certified Complete EHR could validly complete. However, if an integration engine is instead used to perform these criteria, then the integration engine must achieve Modular EHR certification for this criteria as well.

Corepoint Health has taken the required steps to ensure that using Corepoint Integration Engine does not prevent the provider from successfully achieving Meaningful Use. Corepoint Integration Engine not only has been certified for the key criteria above, but also has passed critical Privacy and Security criteria to help ensure that data is not compromised.

Corepoint Integration Engine’s Meaningful Use Certifications:

Transitions of Care

  • 170.314(b)(1) Transitions of care – receive, display and incorporate transition of care/referral summaries
  • 170.314(b)(2) Transitions of care – create and transmit transition of care/referral summaries

Lab Results (eligible hospitals sending lab results to eligible physicians)

  • 170.314(b)(6) Transmission of electronic laboratory tests and values/results to ambulatory providers

Privacy and Security

  • 170.314(d)(1) Authentication, access, control, and authorization
  • 170.314(d)(5) Automatic log-off
  • 170.314(d)(6) Emergency access
  • 170.314(d)(7) End-user device encryption
  • 170.314(d)(8) Integrity

Public Health Reporting

  • 170.314(f)(2) Transmission to immunization registries
  • 170.314(f)(3) Transmission to public health agencies – syndromic surveillance
  • 170.314(f)(4) Transmission of reportable laboratory tests and values/results

Metrics and Quality

  • 170.314(g)(1) Automated numerator recording
  • 170.314(g)(4) Quality management system


Related Blogs

Rhapsody Health Solutions Team

Glossary: Healthcare Interoperability Terms and Definitions

Find definitions of commonly used healthcare interoperability terms in this glossary.

Read more

Rhapsody Health Solutions Team

The role of state, regional HIEs in TEFCA

Healthcare organizations should become involved with local HIEs and lean on your EHR and interoperability vendors for guidance in TEFCA participation.

Read more

Rhapsody Health Solutions Team

Do doctors really care about interoperability? … and other insights from Day 2 of ViVE2022

A session from ViVE Day 2, The Complicated Convergence of Clinical and Claims Data, evolved into a conversation about how challenges in interoperability are secondary to challenges in care delivery,

Read more