Rhapsody Health Solutions Team

HIMSS Analytics Report: Difficulties Aligning HIE Stakeholders

March 12, 2014

We recently commissioned a HIMSS Analytics white paper that consists of several CIOs and VPs from hospitals and healthcare systems of all sizes. We were looking to get unbiased information about where the industry currently stands with interoperability activities, what challenges are causing the most difficulty, and what steps are being taken to overcome the obstacles. HIMSS Analytics did a fantastic job and I encourage you to download the full report:

Current State of Health Data Interoperability in the U.S. Trends, Challenges and Strategies for Success.

There are three distinct themes stand out in the report:

  1. Aligning stakeholders involved in health information exchange is challenging, especially public/state exchange organizations
  2. Various connectivity strategies are being employed
  3. Industry consolidation will have significant impact on future IT decisions

Yet, despite these challenges, every participant said that interoperability is, without a doubt, their organization’s top priority.

Let’s briefly explore challenge number one listed above, the difficulty of aligning multiple stakeholders in the HIE process. There are two different HIE scenarios on display in the HIMSS Analytics report:

  • A hospital in the Midwest has put in the hard work to meet the meaningful use requirements to exchange CCD documents with their statewide HIE. The public HIE, unfortunately, cannot accept CCDs, forcing the hospital to submit data that cannot be indexed for other facilities to access.

Summary: The state HIE, likely started thanks to government grant money, cannot accept patient data from caregivers in the government-mandated format. (From Merriam-Webster: Irony – a situation that is strange or funny because things happen in a way that seems to be the opposite of what you expected.)

  • The second scenario describes a hospital in the Northwest that cannot utilize their state’s HIE due to lack of a master patient index, or MPI. Despite their membership in the HIE, they are not confident in using data from the HIE because they are unsure the information they receive will match the intended patient.  

Summary: Different patient identifiers from multiple applications and facilities create doubt, which in turn makes reliability in HIE data low. What is the benefit of costly HIE participation if the same amount of human investigation is required to identify patients as needed prior to HITECH and EHR adoption?

While the information in the report does illustrate the high level of skepticism about public HIEs, it should not be used as an indictment for all HIEs. There are many HIEs that have proven to be financially viable and have created high value for member organizations. Over the next few years the marketplace will likely weed out the HIEs that have not solved the important interoperability details.

In the meantime, we will continue to work to give provider organizations flexibility to adapt to all standards that exist in the HIE marketplace. Corepoint Integration Engine allows our customers to send data to HIEs in any format required and will also parse and standardize data received HIE data so that it can be incorporated into the EHR. 

Related Blogs

Dan Rice

Taking the next (or first) step on your cloud journey: We’re here to help

No matter where you are on your cloud migration journey, Rhapsody can help. Learn more about how to evaluate your cloud readiness.

Read more

Dan Rice

Six reasons to consider cloud migration

Learn what’s motivating healthcare organizations to migrate infrastructure to the cloud.

Read more

Rhapsody Health Solutions Team

How Michigan DHHS supports high quality data exchange with FHIR

Discover how Michigan's Department of Health and Human Services optimizes modern data exchange with Rhapsody

Read more